IRM's VIEW: On integrating complex geopolitical risks into planning processes

In today’s interconnected world, geopolitical risks are becoming increasingly complex and dynamic, posing significant challenges to organisations across the globe. From trade tensions and economic sanctions to cyber warfare and climate change, the landscape of geopolitical risks is constantly evolving, requiring organisations to adopt a proactive and adaptive approach to mitigating potential disruptions.

This means that boards and executive teams should be focused on current and emerging geopolitical risks, and considering how to manage these risks as part of their planning process to enhance their resilience and sustainability.

One of the most prominent current geopolitical risks is the escalating trade tensions and protectionist policies between major global powers. The ongoing trade disputes between the US and China, as well as the US and the European Union, have generated widespread uncertainty for businesses, leading to supply chain disruptions and increased costs.

Furthermore, tensions and military action in regions such as the South China Sea, Eastern Europe and the Middle East have the potential to impact global trade and investment flows, posing significant challenges for businesses with international operations.

The implications of changes in national leadership and administrations also present noteworthy political risks. Transitions in political leadership can bring about shifts in foreign policy priorities, regulatory frameworks and trade agreements, impacting businesses with global operations. For instance, the change in the US administration in 2021 resulted in shifts in trade policies, environmental regulations and international alliances, prompting organisations to reassess their strategies and operations. The 2024 US elections offer the possibility of an even more disruptive transition in 2025.

Another major risk is the increasing prevalence of cyber threats and digital warfare. State-sponsored cyber attacks, espionage and disinformation campaigns have the potential to disrupt critical infrastructure, undermine trust in institutions and destabilise economies. The growing interconnectedness of digital systems and the rise of artificial intelligence and autonomous technologies further amplify the potential global impact of cyber threats, making it essential for organisations to bolster their cyber security measures and resilience against the inevitable digital disruptions and attacks.

In addition to these current risks, businesses must also prepare for emerging geopolitical challenges, such as the now evident implications of climate change. The increasing frequency and severity of adverse weather events and natural disasters, coupled with resource scarcity and environmental degradation, are likely to exacerbate geopolitical tensions, migration patterns and competition for strategic resources. Boards will need to factor in the potential impacts of climate-related events and the evolving regulatory landscape related to environmental sustainability as part of their strategic planning and risk management processes.

To navigate these complex geopolitical risks, organisations must integrate consideration of these risks into their planning process.

Firstly, this means conducting comprehensive risk assessments to identify and evaluate the risks that are pertinent to their operations and supply chains. This involves understanding the political, economic, social, environmental and technological factors that could impact their business, as well as monitoring geopolitical developments and trends on an ongoing basis.

Secondly, organisations should develop robust contingency plans and risk mitigation strategies to effectively respond to geopolitical disruptions. This may involve diversifying supply chains, establishing alternative sourcing options, identifying climate change risk management and sustainability strategies and enhancing cyber security measures to safeguard against digital threats. Executive teams should engage in scenario planning exercises to anticipate and prepare for a range of geopolitical contingencies, enabling them to make informed decisions in times of uncertainty.

Finally, organisations should foster strategic partnerships and collaborations with government agencies, industry associations and other stakeholders to stay informed about geopolitical developments and collectively address shared geopolitical risks. Only by working together can we manage such potentially disruptive risks effectively.



Share Story:

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE


Investec is disrupting premium finance – Podcast
Investec made waves in entering the premium finance market, where listening and evolving in response to brokers made a real difference.

Communicating in a crisis
Deborah Ritchie speaks to Chief Inspector Tracy Mortimer of the Specialist Operations Planning Unit in Greater Manchester Police's Civil Contingencies and Resilience Unit; Inspector Darren Spurgeon, AtHoc lead at Greater Manchester Police; and Chris Ullah, Solutions Expert at BlackBerry AtHoc, and himself a former Police Superintendent. For more information click here

Advertisement